Tamar Jacoby
Hewitt: Hour 1 – Hugh returns to the immigration bill with the Manhattan Institute’s Tamar Jacoby, who is one of the more articulate proponents of the immigration bill.
Hewitt: Hour 1 – Hugh returns to the immigration bill with the Manhattan Institute’s Tamar Jacoby, who is one of the more articulate proponents of the immigration bill.
Hewitt: Hour 2 – Guest host Carol Platt Liebau continues to take calls on the Senate immigration compromise, and updates on the day’s political news.
Hewitt: Hour 1 – Guest host Carol Platt Liebau continues the immigration debate, and talks with Center For Security Policy’s Frank Gaffney about what might have been discussed during the recent U.S.-Iran meetings.
Hewitt: Hour 3 – Guest host Dean Barnett sits in for Hugh and goes over the top 10 worst or most disappointing Part 3 movies of all time, and then Tarzana Joe concludes the week with a Memorial Day poem.
Hewitt: Hour 2 – Guest host Dean Barnett speaks to Fred and Charles about the political impact of the immigration bill, discusses the financial impact and other market news with CNBC’s Larry Kudlow, and updates on PBS’ attempt to scuttle the Islam Vs. Islamist movie produced by Frank Gaffney.
Hewitt: Hour 1 – Guest host Dean Barnett recaps the week of the unveiling of the Senate immigration compromise, and takes calls all over the map about whether it’ll pass or not.
Hewitt: Hour 1 – Hugh begins his semi-annual campaign to raise funds for the Semper Fi Fund, which helps supplement the care and needs of wounded warriors and their families.
Hewitt: Hour 2 – Hugh continues to hear many stories of how the Semper Fi Fund has helped wounded warriors and their families as they try to recover from their injuries sustained while serving the country in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hewitt: Hour 3 – Hugh concludes his Memorial Day Weekend special broadcast of bringing success stories of wounded warriors helped by the good people of the Semper Fi Fund.
Hewitt: Hour 3 – Hugh spends extended segments with the Smart Guys to discuss potential Constitutional problems that could arise as a result of implementing the new Senate immigration bill.