One more thing about Andrew.

March 1, 2012 by  
Filed under The Lileks Zone

it seems we’ve forgotten Andrew’s great omission. Constant listeners to Hugh’s show may recall how our host checked the preface of Breitbart’s book, looking for his name among the innumerable luminaries the author thanked. It’s natural! Everyone in the media world does it, if they think there’s a chance they might be listed.

But Hugh’s name wasn’t in the list. You might recall the show where he brought this fact to Andrew’s attention, and did so with the usual playful cheer he normally reserves for tormenting Duane. Breitbart was mortified. He felt horrible. You might think: well, a guy gets called out on a radio show for a faux pas like that, he’s going to work up all the contrition he can muster, salve the host’s tender ego, then hang up the phone and think “Dude. Really? Okay, next book, whatever.”

After the interview my phone rang; it was Andrew. He started to explain why he was calling, and I had to cut him off: look, pal, you do that to my friend Hugh,  you got no business coming around here. He laughed, said okay, you heard: now what can I do to make it right?

He wanted to know Hugh’s hobbies or tastes or side interests so he could do something to apologize. So Hugh, if you’re reading this – that explains the strippergram at the office. Mystery solved, eh?

I don’t know what he did, but it was typical. He was a generous man in every sense that matters, I suspect – generous to family, to friends, allies, and even to his enemies, inasmuch as he gave them so many reasons to amp up their hate and feel better about himself. Whether the generosity extended to himself, I can’t say – but it seems as if he lived his life in broadcast mode, a tall tower shooting out rays in all directions, wires taut and quivering. And finally they snapped.

According to a story about his last hours, he was talking with a liberal in a bar – someone he’d just met and befriended. Not yelling or telling him he was an idiot, but talking. There’s the big grand stage events that grab headlines, and there’s the small moments when you can insert a sliver of doubt into someone’s ideas, or at least make them realize that the other side isn’t a bunch of lemon-sucking old prudes.

It’s not enough to confront. You have to convince. The left may have disliked him for the first one. They hated his power to do the second.


8 Responses to “One more thing about Andrew.”
  1. Pete Gjerness says:

    Thanks for the glimpse into the real Andrew. Somehow, I think we all knew he was genuine, and a decent fellow, and you’ve given us confirmation. He will be missed. RIP, Andrew.

  2. JB Duncan says:

    A poignant, nicely crafted, appropriately irreverent and trenchant tribute to the, in life, irrepressible Andrew Breitbart.

    Thanks Mr. Lileks

    PS so when is Hugh going to post the Strippergram photos on his blog? Inquiring minds….

  3. 400lbgo says:

    Knowing that there are people like Lileks, Steyn and some guy named Hewitt around to carry the torch makes this great loss a little less painful.

  4. Chris Bogdan says:

    Great tribute

  5. Cathy York says:

    James, a very fitting companion to what you said on the show today; thanks for both.

    And talk to Duane about the strippergram pix; he’s quire resourceful ;-)

  6. Duane Patterson says:

    James, I never knew the rest of that story. hugh adored the fact that he had something to gig him over. i can’t believe he really took it that seriously. but then again, that was andrew in a nutshell, wasn’t it? in spite of the bluster and the ogre caricature the left painted, he was gracious and caring to a fault.

  7. tmrigsby says:

    I remember that show very well. A few of us were giving Andrew a hard time on twitter during the show on the hhrs stream. He joined in and was so good natured about our teasing. My brother met Andrew at a Tea Party event in Tucson, he and Dana took the time to talk with ppl and take pictures. My heart deeply hurts for the loss of this man. Continuing in prayer for his family, friends, and the conservative cause.

  8. Seke says:

    A character.

    A wonderful and influential character.

    Selfish of me I know, but long may he remain influential.

    That’s the role everyone he influenced must support.

    I’m not religious but my prayers to his young family without their husband and father.

    What a crushingly intense personal loss for them

Important Links
Lileks Private reserve
Duanes World
Hugh Hewitt Store
  • RSS Hugh Hewitt Blog

    • NBC’s Chuck Todd On The Start Of Campaign 2016 April 18, 2015
      NBC’s Chuck Todd joined me on Friday’s show: Audio: 04-17hhs-todd Transcript: HH: Beginning this hour with Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s Meet The Press on Sunday. Chuck, with everything going on, including the consulate bombing in Irbil, I don’t even know what you’re going to start with. But it’s got to be, I assume, the Hillary-Rubio launch of the week and ever […]
    • CNN’s Jake Tapper On Hillary and the Benghazi Investigation April 17, 2015
      CNN’s Jake tapper joined me on Friday’s show: Audio: 04-17hhs-tapper Transcript: HH: I begin this last day of the week with Jake Tapper, host of CNN’s The Lead. Jake, welcome back, good to talk to you. JT: Can you hear me? HH: Oh, I got you now. JT: I’m on a cell phone, so I’m going to try and find a good place. Can you hear me now? HH: Yeah, you’re perfect […]