H2: 12/30/09 Greg Koukl, Michael Shermer

December 30, 2009 by  
Filed under Radio Show, The God Debates

12300902 Hugh Hewitt: Hour 2 – Hugh continues his three hour conversation ending the broadcast year debating God with Greg Koukl of Stand To Reason, and Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine.

Comments

3 Responses to “H2: 12/30/09 Greg Koukl, Michael Shermer”
  1. tennkan says:

    Another way to determine which “Holy Book” or worldview is true is the presuppositional approach (a la Douglas Wilson). The discussion in this hour knocked on the door of this method but didn’t open it.

    Mr. Shermer seemed trapped into restating his position rather than going from one explanation to another.

    I thought the discussion was very well handled on both sides.

    • Jason Moore says:

      Wow, I could not agree more. I thought Mr. Shermer needed to be shown how arbitrary and inconsistent his position is. Mr. Koukl did get him to admit that he has a faith position but (perhaps for lack of time) could not compare their two faiths.

      Regarding the evidence, Mr. Shermer takes DNA too lightly. DNA is a 4 letter code. There is a 100% inference that codes come from human intelligence with zero counter examples. You don’t get more scientific than that. I’d bet my life that the God of scripture created that code and not aliens.

  2. Christian Schultz says:

    Regarding the penalty of death for disrespeting one’s parents; it is my understanding that the harsh penalty is not intended as a deterrant to disrespectful behavior as much as it was intended as a method of elevating the importance of respect. Further, as I understand it, and I’ll concede I’m certainly no scholar, the burden of proof necessary to mete out the punishment was sufficiently high as to make it nearly impossible to prove. Lastly, as I understand it the historical record is nearly void of examples of the penalty being exercised.

    So, while it is commonly dragged out by those who argue that the Bible is deeply flawed what it does is reveal their unfamiliarity with the subject they are debating. It is difficult to, credibly, condemn a thing one does not fully understand.

Important Links
Lileks Private reserve
Duanes World
Hugh Hewitt Store
  • RSS Hugh Hewitt Blog

    • Reading For The Red Eye To Meet The Press February 28, 2015
      Off to D.C. tonight after the show for a Sunday appearance on Meet the Press.  Taking with me galleys of C. J. Box’s Endangered and of Guy P. Benson’s and Mary Katharine Ham’s End of Discussion to pass the red eye hours. Tune in Sunday morning as Chuck Todd will be quizzing Dr. Ben Carson and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.  And if you are here because […]
    • Chuck Todd On The CPAC Proceedings February 28, 2015
      Meet The Press host Chuck Todd joined me for his regular Friday spot and we talked through what CPAC has shown (and not shown) about the state of the GOP race for the 2016 nomination: Audio: 02-27hhs-todd transcript: HH: Of course, it is bitterly cold in the nation’s capital, so of course Chuck Todd of NBC’s Meet The Press has invited me back to the panel th […]