H2: 12/30/09 Greg Koukl, Michael Shermer

December 30, 2009 by  
Filed under Radio Show, The God Debates

12300902 Hugh Hewitt: Hour 2 – Hugh continues his three hour conversation ending the broadcast year debating God with Greg Koukl of Stand To Reason, and Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine.

Comments

3 Responses to “H2: 12/30/09 Greg Koukl, Michael Shermer”
  1. tennkan says:

    Another way to determine which “Holy Book” or worldview is true is the presuppositional approach (a la Douglas Wilson). The discussion in this hour knocked on the door of this method but didn’t open it.

    Mr. Shermer seemed trapped into restating his position rather than going from one explanation to another.

    I thought the discussion was very well handled on both sides.

    • Jason Moore says:

      Wow, I could not agree more. I thought Mr. Shermer needed to be shown how arbitrary and inconsistent his position is. Mr. Koukl did get him to admit that he has a faith position but (perhaps for lack of time) could not compare their two faiths.

      Regarding the evidence, Mr. Shermer takes DNA too lightly. DNA is a 4 letter code. There is a 100% inference that codes come from human intelligence with zero counter examples. You don’t get more scientific than that. I’d bet my life that the God of scripture created that code and not aliens.

  2. Christian Schultz says:

    Regarding the penalty of death for disrespeting one’s parents; it is my understanding that the harsh penalty is not intended as a deterrant to disrespectful behavior as much as it was intended as a method of elevating the importance of respect. Further, as I understand it, and I’ll concede I’m certainly no scholar, the burden of proof necessary to mete out the punishment was sufficiently high as to make it nearly impossible to prove. Lastly, as I understand it the historical record is nearly void of examples of the penalty being exercised.

    So, while it is commonly dragged out by those who argue that the Bible is deeply flawed what it does is reveal their unfamiliarity with the subject they are debating. It is difficult to, credibly, condemn a thing one does not fully understand.

Important Links
Lileks Private reserve
Duanes World
Hugh Hewitt Store
  • RSS Hugh Hewitt Blog

    • The Longest Congressional Campaign And The House Leadership Battle April 22, 2014
      We have grown used to long presidential campaigns.  Those begin the day after the “off-year” election ends, and we ought to expect “exploratory committees” and even formal declarations of a campaign for the presidency to pour forth in November and December of this year. GOP Chairman Reince Priebus may hold off the onslaught of presidential primary debates by […]
    • Springtime In Washington: Watching The Obamacare Spin Bloom and Russia Grow April 21, 2014
      My Washington Examiner column this morning concerns vast cohort of older Americans and the highly unlikely prospect of their being spun on the reality of Obamacare, no matter how many press conferences and speeches the president delivers.  Watching the spin unravel under the wight of the reality of the fractured and ever more expensive health care system won […]